The hype isn't that great right now, honestly. I'm with you. I don't care much about the graphics (though i want them to be nice). I just want a way deeper experience then Fable 1.Fable 2 doesn't look THAT bad
If the gameplay can match Mr. Monyleux's words, we may be looking at a phenomenal game. Otherwise, it may end up being worse than the original Fable.
Pretty graphics won't make or break Fable 2... the gameplay will... If Molyneux doesn't absolutely nail this whole 'emotional engagement' thing, Fable 2 could really falter...
I think people are just trying to piss off saolin
I'm not crazy for the art style, but technically, it looks very good.
I like the art styIe, but in all seriousness it is just the tip of the iceberg.
I personally think the graphics are meh. Nothing too bad nothing too good. Most of the topics you see are just a response to Saolin's Fable-fanboyism a few weeks ago.
i just looked at the lionhead wesite and the fable 2 screenshots. i have to say that they don't look bad. i don't believe that the game will win an award for best graphics but they do look fine in my opinion. i played fable and loved it and i think that the graphics are an obvious improvement and i think that they look good compared to the previous game and other games that are available today. thats just my opinion.
fable 2 looks awesome to me, im no good at telling good graphics from bad for example I thing gears looks OK not great but OK I think GRAW1 looks better
Considering what's been released already (Call of Duty 4, STALKER, Crysis)... yes, it does look THAT bad.
[QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles'']If the gameplay can match Mr. Monyleux's words, we may be looking at a phenomenal game. Otherwise, it may end up being worse than the original Fable.[/QUOTE]The original Fable is a fantastic game and is one of my favorite games. Only problem with it was that it was too short and it didn't have half the things Peter said it would.
[QUOTE=''Ilived''][QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles'']If the gameplay can match Mr. Monyleux's words, we may be looking at a phenomenal game. Otherwise, it may end up being worse than the original Fable.[/QUOTE]The original Fable is a fantastic game and is one of my favorite games. Only problem with it was that it was too short and it didn't have half the things Peter said it would.[/QUOTE]It was a pretty fun game, but once you've married over twenty women and bought numerous houses and killed off all of your friends and mentors, what else is there to do? Uh... I guess you could furiously punch your wife and kick chickens around. Behold the future of open-ended gameplay?
[QUOTE=''Juggernaut140'']I think people are just trying to piss off saolin[/QUOTE]agreed, or trying to lure him
I think Fable could be a great MMO...*goes to leave because he knows how many people hat MMO's even though THEY ARE THE FUTURE OF GAMING*
[QUOTE=''BlizzardBear'']I think Fable could be a great MMO...*goes to leave because he knows how many people hat MMO's even though THEY ARE THE FUTURE OF GAMING*[/QUOTE]You know what, I think it actually would. You should be Peter Monyleux! :P
[QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles''][QUOTE=''Ilived''][QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles'']If the gameplay can match Mr. Monyleux's words, we may be looking at a phenomenal game. Otherwise, it may end up being worse than the original Fable.[/QUOTE]The original Fable is a fantastic game and is one of my favorite games. Only problem with it was that it was too short and it didn't have half the things Peter said it would.[/QUOTE]It was a pretty fun game, but once you've married over twenty women and bought numerous houses and killed off all of your friends and mentors, what else is there to do? Uh... I guess you could furiously punch your wife and kick chickens around. Behold the future of open-ended gameplay?[/QUOTE]In any case, I was just talking about the game itself which was really fun. Sure after you do everything there is to do it gets boring...but that is true about every game that doesn't have multiplayer.
[QUOTE=''Ilived''][QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles''][QUOTE=''Ilived''][QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles'']If the gameplay can match Mr. Monyleux's words, we may be looking at a phenomenal game. Otherwise, it may end up being worse than the original Fable.[/QUOTE]The original Fable is a fantastic game and is one of my favorite games. Only problem with it was that it was too short and it didn't have half the things Peter said it would.[/QUOTE]It was a pretty fun game, but once you've married over twenty women and bought numerous houses and killed off all of your friends and mentors, what else is there to do? Uh... I guess you could furiously punch your wife and kick chickens around. Behold the future of open-ended gameplay?[/QUOTE]In any case, I was just talking about the game itself which was really fun. Sure after you do everything there is to do it gets boring...but that is true about every game that doesn't have multiplayer.[/QUOTE]That's true, but the action is too repetitive. You can't really be a sole magic user because you'd get your ass kicked, so you have to use swords. It's kind of linear in that respect. Why add magic if they know that sword-play is going to kill more people?
[QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles''][QUOTE=''BlizzardBear'']I think Fable could be a great MMO...*goes to leave because he knows how many people hat MMO's even though THEY ARE THE FUTURE OF GAMING*[/QUOTE]You know what, I think it actually would. You should be Peter Monyleux! :P[/QUOTE]YAY
[QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles''][QUOTE=''Ilived''][QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles''][QUOTE=''Ilived''][QUOTE=''Killer_Wuggles'']If the gameplay can match Mr. Monyleux's words, we may be looking at a phenomenal game. Otherwise, it may end up being worse than the original Fable.[/QUOTE]The original Fable is a fantastic game and is one of my favorite games. Only problem with it was that it was too short and it didn't have half the things Peter said it would.[/QUOTE]It was a pretty fun game, but once you've married over twenty women and bought numerous houses and killed off all of your friends and mentors, what else is there to do? Uh... I guess you could furiously punch your wife and kick chickens around. Behold the future of open-ended gameplay?[/QUOTE]In any case, I was just talking about the game itself which was really fun. Sure after you do everything there is to do it gets boring...but that is true about every game that doesn't have multiplayer.[/QUOTE]That's true, but the action is too repetitive. You can't really be a sole magic user because you'd get your ass kicked, so you have to use swords. It's kind of linear in that respect. Why add magic if they know that sword-play is going to kill more people?[/QUOTE]i would have to agree with the wuggles here because the only way to kill the last boss was with a bow and arrow. if you could have killed jack the whatever with a sword or magic as well i think that the game would have been better and shown more thought towards the magic side. it sort of shows that if there was only really one of way going through out the game. while there were a decent amount to things to do on the side there was only one real possible character that would give you what you needed to win. i am sure that people have beat the game with magic based characters but really the game made it obvious what you should do. and there were only so many times that my character could break into a shop or get married before i became bored. i like the game enough to play through it twice(which is a lot to say for me) but it did get old and was not as large as i had hoped......i am out of breath here
No comments:
Post a Comment